_valerian

April 10, 2012

Scratching the surface of Hong Kong

Filed under: darkroom,Photography — John @ 10:14 pm

( U*P*D*A*T*E This is admittedly one of the least essential entries in the history of this blog. Really. )

On a trip to Map Camera a couple of weeks ago I picked up a modular data back for my Contax T3. The rear doors are easily changed and I was interested in seeing what it would be like to see what kind of work I’d make with those little numbers imprinted in the lower right corner. A week later, I took the T3 on a short trip to Hong Kong. Leaving the Leicas at home I loaded the T3 with black and white Fuji Presto and shot some color film through a Fuji Natura Classica and this weirdo Fuji HD-M I picked up from the junk bin at a camera fair.
Of the 12 rolls of Fuji Presto, 10 went through the T3. All ten of these came off the reels out of the wash showing several scratches on the emulsion side of the film down the entire length of the rolls. (The two rolls shot with the HD-M though, were fine.) This T3 had been serviced for a faulty take-up spool back in September of 2011, with similar, yet intermittent scratches from a few rolls before it went out of commission.
Since the film I shot with it post-repair has all been scratch-free, it could have only been the fault of the new data back. As I test I loaded an expired roll of color film and fired off about six frames. After rewinding the film and pulling out the tip with a film picker, I was able to see the same kind of scratches in the same place in the emulsion. Next I changed the rear door back to the original one and repeated the experiment with another fresh and expired roll of film. No scratches were to be found with this second test roll.

The culprit (other than my own lack of checking new used gear before traveling abroad) might have to do with the battery in the data back. The date function is powered not by the camera but by a flat battery which fits snugly in a shallow compartment under the metal film rollers that you can see by the red arrow in the photo below. (The stock film door is attached to the camera in this photo.)

What I think happened is that after inserting a fresh battery I didn’t tighten the two small screws that hold both the battery cap AND rear roller assembly down tight enough. Therefore the springy rollers pushed down with enough force to scratch the film as it was wound both ways first out and then back into the canister.

Eh, I’m not too angry or devastated or anything. When you mess up, you mess up. And Hong Kong is definitely a place I’ll be returning to sometime soon. What an amazing city. Color is likely the best way to go about it, anyway. Some scans of those prints will be up here soon.

January 15, 2012

Film Flow 2012

Filed under: darkroom — John @ 1:35 pm

I spent 2011 working to refine my photographic workflow. At one point contact sheets were mentioned and they turned out to be worth far more than the cost of both the paper used to print them on and the clear binders used to store them in. So having spent a year working out methods for organizing negatives I’m looking forward to following through with 2012. For what it’s worth the total cost for processing the film above is about $40 US and a few evenings using my film developing methods.

Here’s how the image above breaks down:

December 30, 2011

A sneak peak

Filed under: darkroom — John @ 10:36 pm

Some people commune with nature to clear their minds, I’ve got my darkroom. The past few days have been spent working through a backlog of prints. Today’s session was from mid summer. Some digital snaps taken while the prints were still in the wash:

Developing question

Filed under: darkroom — John @ 9:02 pm

Been catching up in the darkroom this past week.

I’ve got a question for those with greater darkroom skills than I- – this is the print:

But after the wash I noticed this spot:

I get these spots from time to time on my prints. Not usually this large, but sometimes there will be more than one. I am not exactly sure at what point in the printing process they are formed but I do notice small bubbles of air on my prints at times and surmise that this lighter circle is from such a bubble. The negative itself is fine, so I know this happens sometime in the darkroom.

Does anyone know what it could be? Is it from. . .

A. When the print is face down in the developer, air bubbles are trapped and keep developer from the latent image?

B. When the print is face up in the developer a small part of the paper is too near the surface, and too little chemistry hits the print?

Either way, more concentration on the paper in the chemistry is needed. That or more consistent agitation. My printing pace is fairly quick- as soon as one workprint is in the developer I’m preparing the enlarger with the next negative. One sheet per image keeps things going smoothly- – except for times like this when it doesn’t.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress

Bad Behavior has blocked 93 access attempts in the last 7 days.